ISSN : 1302-7123 | E-ISSN : 1308-5123
Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire [Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp]
Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp. 2026; 60(1): 93-102 | DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2026.70933

Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire

Kaan Sunter1, Kadir Yagiz Turker1, Can Ates2, Mehmet Ali Koc1, Yusuf Sevim3, Cemal Ensari4, Onur Ilkay Dincer4, Ismail Cem Eray5, Burak Yavuz5, Timucin Erol6, Siyar Ersoz1, Burak Kutlu1, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu1
1Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Aksaray University Faculty of Medicine Aksaray, Türkiye
3Department of General Surgery, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Türkiye
4Department of General Surgery, Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye
5Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye
6Department of General Surgery, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire in Türkiye.
Methods: The QoR-15 was translated into Turkish through a rigorous process involving independent translations, consensus, forward–backward translation, and review. The questionnaire was administered to patients undergoing major abdominal surgery preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 7, and 30. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α, McDonald’s Omega, and the inter-item correlation coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and responsiveness was analyzed using Cohen's effect size and the standardized response mean (SRM).
Results: A total of 510 patients participated in the study; 335 (65.69%) were <65 years old, and 279 (54.71%) were male. The Turkish version of QoR-15 (QoR-15T) demonstrated good internal consistency, with Cronbach's α values of 0.896 and 0.888 for preoperative and postoperative administrations, respectively, and McDonald’s Omega coefficients of 0.894 and 0.878. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-factor (two-dimensional) structure of the QoR-15T. The comparative fit indices for Models 1 and 2 were 0.970 and 0.991, respectively. QoR-15T showed responsiveness to changes in health status, with Cohen's effect size (1.22) and the standardized response mean (1.18) indicating its ability to detect clinically important changes.
Conclusion: The QoR-15T is a reliable, valid, and responsive questionnaire for assessing the quality of recovery in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Its ability to capture patients' perspectives and multidimensional aspects of recovery makes it a valuable tool for clinical and research purposes.

Keywords: Major abdominal surgery, patient-reported outcome, QoR-15, quality of recovery, validation


Corresponding Author: Mehmet Ali Koc
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
LookUs & Online Makale